ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD (AOR)

The Supreme Court ruling reinforces AoRs’ accountability for petition accuracy, even if prepared by others. As authorized advocates, AoRs must personally verify all case documents, interact directly with clients, and comply with strict rules under Supreme Court Rules, Order IV, ensuring legal precision and avoiding misrepresentation or disciplinary penalties consistently.

Last Updated on 24th February, 2025
2 minutes, 53 seconds

Description

Copyright infringement not intended

Picture Courtesy: Lawyerchennai

Context: 

The Supreme Court ruled that Advocates-on-Record (AoRs) are responsible for the accuracy of petitions filed before the Court, even if they are prepared by other advocates.

About Advocates-on-Record (AoRs)

Origin and Mandate:

  • Introduced under Article 145(1) of the Constitution, AoRs are a specialized category of advocates authorized to represent clients in the Supreme Court.
  • Their role is governed by Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, which grants them exclusive rights to file and conduct cases in the Court.

Requirements to Become an AoR:

  • Enrolled with any State Bar Council.
  • Minimum 4 years of legal practice.
  • Completed a 1-year training under a senior AoR.
  • Passed the Supreme Court AoR examination.
  • Maintains an office within 10 miles of the Supreme Court in Delhi and employs a registered clerk.

Key Responsibilities:

  • File Vakalatnama: The AoR is the only advocate authorized to submit a Vakalatnama (power of attorney) on behalf of a client.
  • Draft and Verify Legal Documents: Ensures petitions, affidavits, and applications are accurate and comply with Supreme Court rules.
  • Personal Liability: Accountable for court fees and any misconduct, with penalties including removal from the AoR register under Rule 10 of Order IV.
  • Direct Client Interaction: Must clarify doubts with clients or instructing advocates to avoid suppression of facts.

Recent Supreme Court Judgment

The Court held that AoRs cannot shift blame for inaccuracies in petitions to clients or other advocates. They must verify all facts and documents before filing.

The case arose from false statements in remission pleas filed by a Senior Advocate. The Court noted "gross misrepresentation" and emphasized AoRs’ duty to interact directly with clients.

Guidelines Issued:

  • AoRs must review case papers and drafts to ensure factual accuracy.
  • If doubts arise, they must seek clarifications from clients or local advocates.
  • Failure to exercise due diligence may lead to disciplinary action, including permanent removal from the AoR register.

Must Read Articles: 

ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD SYSTEM

ADVOCATE ON RECORD

SENIOR ADVOCATES

Source: 

livelaw

PRACTICE QUESTION

 Q.Discuss the principle of "judicial review" and its limitations in the Indian constitutional framework. 150 words

Free access to e-paper and WhatsApp updates

Let's Get In Touch!