The Supreme Court ruling reinforces AoRs’ accountability for petition accuracy, even if prepared by others. As authorized advocates, AoRs must personally verify all case documents, interact directly with clients, and comply with strict rules under Supreme Court Rules, Order IV, ensuring legal precision and avoiding misrepresentation or disciplinary penalties consistently.
Copyright infringement not intended
Picture Courtesy: Lawyerchennai
The Supreme Court ruled that Advocates-on-Record (AoRs) are responsible for the accuracy of petitions filed before the Court, even if they are prepared by other advocates.
The Court held that AoRs cannot shift blame for inaccuracies in petitions to clients or other advocates. They must verify all facts and documents before filing.
The case arose from false statements in remission pleas filed by a Senior Advocate. The Court noted "gross misrepresentation" and emphasized AoRs’ duty to interact directly with clients. |
Must Read Articles:
Source:
PRACTICE QUESTION Q.Discuss the principle of "judicial review" and its limitations in the Indian constitutional framework. 150 words |
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved