Daily Editorial Analysis

Editorial Analysis based on “Southern sojourn: On the 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting in India” which was published in The Hindu.

Introduction:

• The 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) is being held in Kochi, Kerala, with delegates from over 60 countries in attendance.
• The meeting includes both voting ‘Consultative Parties’ and non-voting observers, along with independent experts. A significant agenda item is the proposal to introduce a regulatory framework for tourism in Antarctica.

Details about Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM):

• Participants: The ATCM includes 29 Consultative Parties with voting rights and other countries with observer status.
• Purpose: The meeting addresses issues related to the management and preservation of Antarctica.
• Tourism in Antarctica:
  • Current Scenario: Antarctica has no indigenous population and remains largely unspoiled, making it an attractive destination for tourists seeking unique experiences.
  • Tourism Growth: Tourist numbers have increased from 8,000 in 1993 to 105,000 in 2022, surpassing the number of scientists stationed on the continent.
  • Environmental Concerns: Increased tourism poses risks such as pollution, accidents, and potential disruption to the continent’s unique biodiversity.
• Proposed Regulatory Framework:
  • Initiative by Like-minded Countries: A group including India is advocating for regulations to manage the impact of tourism.
  • Potential Regulations: These might include limits on the number of visitors, stricter guidelines for tour operators, and measures to minimize environmental impact.
• Environmental and Geopolitical Concerns:
  • Environmental Impact: More tourists mean more human activity, which can lead to pollution and accidents that threaten the fragile Antarctic ecosystem.
  • Geopolitical Implications: The growing presence of tourists, particularly from specific countries, raises concerns about potential territorial claims and geopolitical influence despite the treaty’s commitment to non-claimancy.
• India’s Position:
  • Advocacy: India supports the proposal for a regulatory framework to protect Antarctica’s environment.
  • Future Prospects: While currently minimal, Indian tourism to Antarctica could increase, influenced by growing prosperity.
  • Strategic Considerations: India must balance supporting environmental protections with ensuring that any new regulations do not disadvantage its future tourism interests.

Issues and way ahead

• Environmental and Conservation Aspects:
• Environmental Fragility:
  • Antarctica's ecosystem is exceptionally delicate, with its biodiversity adapted to extreme conditions. Increased human activity threatens to introduce pollutants and disrupt habitats.
• Pollution Risks:
  • More tourists mean more waste and emissions, potentially damaging the pristine environment. Strict waste management and emissions control measures are crucial.
• Accident Potential:
  • With more ships and people, the likelihood of accidents rises, which could have severe environmental consequences such as oil spills or wildlife disturbances.
• Geopolitical and Strategic Concerns:
• Territorial Claims:
  • The Antarctic Treaty prohibits new claims or expansion of existing claims, but increased human presence might influence geopolitical dynamics. Countries with a more significant presence might push for favorable terms in future negotiations.
• National Interests:
  • Countries like India, which are advocating for regulations, need to ensure that these regulations do not limit their future opportunities for scientific research and tourism development in Antarctica.
• Tourism as a Geopolitical Tool:
  • Tourism can serve as a soft power tool, enhancing a nation’s influence in the region. Therefore, countries might vie to increase their tourist numbers to bolster their presence and influence.
• Socio-Economic Considerations:
• Economic Opportunities:
  • Regulated tourism can provide economic benefits, creating jobs and generating revenue. Sustainable tourism practices can ensure that these benefits do not come at the expense of environmental degradation.
• Regulatory Balance:
  • Finding a balance between promoting tourism for economic gain and implementing strict regulations to protect the environment is essential. Over-regulation might stifle tourism growth, while under-regulation could lead to environmental harm.
• India’s Strategic Approach:
• Support for Regulation:
  • India’s support for the regulatory framework reflects its commitment to environmental protection and sustainable tourism.
• Future Preparedness:
  • As Indian tourists to Antarctica increase, India must ensure that regulations do not restrict its ability to benefit from tourism. It should advocate for fair and equitable rules that allow for responsible tourism development.
• Long-Term Vision:
  • India should also consider its long-term scientific and strategic interests in Antarctica, ensuring that regulations facilitate rather than hinder its research and geopolitical goals.

Conclusion:

• The 46th ATCM's focus on regulating tourism in Antarctica is a crucial step towards preserving the continent’s unique environment while balancing the interests of various countries. India’s role as a proponent of this regulatory framework reflects its commitment to sustainability. However, India must remain vigilant to ensure that these regulations do not impede its future opportunities in tourism and scientific exploration. The meeting’s outcomes could significantly shape the future of tourism and environmental conservation in Antarctica.

For detailed analysis on 46th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM 46), also known as the Antarctic Parliament refer:

https://www.iasgyan.in/daily-current-affairs/antarctic-parliament

Download PDF