MAHADAYI RIVER

Last Updated on 15th April, 2025
9 minutes, 12 seconds

Description

Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.

Context

Bandura Nala project in Karnataka Mahadayi River basin faces strong opposition from environmentalists, religious figures & local communities due to concerns over ecological degradation & alleged irregularities in land acquisition processes.

Bandura Nala Project

Aspect

Details

Location

Near Bandur, Karnataka in Mahadayi (Mandovi) River Basin

Type

Water diversion & irrigation project

Executing Authority

Karnataka Water Resources Department

Purpose

To divert water from Bandura stream to meet irrigation & drinking water needs in drought prone areas of Karnataka

Components

Diversion weirs
Canal networks
Check dams
Irrigation infrastructure

Estimated Cost

Not publicly available; part of broader Mahadayi river projects

Opposition

Environmentalists Fear of ecosystem damage
Religious leaders Sacred land, cultural concerns
Farmers & locals Fear of displacement, water rights conflict

Main Issues Raised

Lack of proper environmental clearance
Diversion may affect ecological flow
Sacred groves, cultural sites may be affected

Current Status (2025)

Controversial Opposition mounting; legal & public pressure increasing

Legislative Reference

Related to broader Mahadayi river water dispute under Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956

Mahadayi (Mandovi) River

Parameter

Details

Local Names

Mahadayi in Karnataka
Mandovi in Goa

Origin

Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats near Khanapur Taluk, Belagavi district, Karnataka

Length

~111 km

Total Basin Area

~2032 sq km

States Covered

Karnataka (origin)
Goa (major river flow)
Maharashtra (minor contribution)

Discharge Location

Arabian Sea, near Panaji, Goa

Drainage Type

Seasonal river with high monsoon flow

Terrain

Originates in high elevation forested hills; traverses rugged terrain, plateaus & estuarine plains

Ecoregions Crossed

Western Ghats moist deciduous & evergreen forests
Coastal estuaries

Key Tributaries

Tributary Name

Side

Origin & Notes

Kalasa Nala

Left bank

From Kanakumbi region in Karnataka; involved in Kalasa Banduri Nala Project

Bandura Nala

Left bank

Originates near Bandur in Karnataka; proposed diversion is under Bandura Nala Project

Surla River

Right bank

Originates in Maharashtra; joins Mahadayi in Goa

Bhandura Nala

Left bank

Lesser-known tributary contributing in upstream region

Par River

Left bank

Seasonal tributary contributing to flow in Karnataka segment

Valvanti River

Right bank

Drains northern Goa & joins near Sattari

Zarme, Poriem, Ragoda

Right bank

Short streams in Goa; enhance flow during monsoons

Ecological & Hydrological Importance

Aspect

Details

Sanctuaries in Basin

Bhimgad WLS (Karnataka)
Mhadei Wildlife Sanctuary (Goa)

Flora & Fauna

Rich in endemic & endangered species: tigers, leopards, lion tailed macaques

UNESCO Significance

Part of Western Ghats a UNESCO World Heritage Site

Estuarine Importance

Mandovi forms vital Goan estuaries, rich in fisheries & mangroves

Monsoon Dependency

Over 90% of flow occurs during monsoon (June–September)

Threats

Deforestation
Sand mining
Unregulated tourism
Water diversion

Inter-State Water Dispute

Component

Details

Dispute Focus

Karnataka attempt to divert 7.56 TMC water from Mahadayi basin

Projects Involved

Kalasa Nala Diversion
Banduri Nala Diversion
Bandura Project

Goa's Argument

River is lifeline; diversion reduces ecological flow & threatens biodiversity

Tribunal Formation

Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal (MWDT), 2010

Tribunal Verdict

In 2018 allowed Karnataka limited diversion, challenged by Goa

Supreme Court Status

Pending appeals; matter sub judice

Bandura Nala Project vs Kalasa Banduri Nala Project

Feature

Bandura Nala Project

Kalasa-Banduri Nala Project

Location

Bandur region, Khanapur Taluk, Belagavi district, Karnataka

Near Kanakumbi (Kalasa) & Kankumbi (Banduri), Belagavi, Karnataka

Target Tributary

Bandura Nala a small tributary of Mahadayi River

Kalasa & Banduri Nalas both tributaries of Mahadayi River

Purpose

Water diversion for drinking & irrigation in nearby taluks

Primarily for drinking water supply to Hubballi-Dharwad, Bailhongal & Nargund

Estimated Water to be Diverted

Approx. 2–3 TMC (est. not officially stated)

7.56 TMC (Tribunal allocation in 2018)

Environmental Concerns

Proximity to Bhimgad WLS
Impact on sacred groves

Falls within Eco-sensitive zone of Western Ghats
Threat to Mhadei WLS

Protests/Opposition

Strong opposition by environmentalists, religious leaders & locals

Prolonged protests by Goa govt, activists & green groups

Legal/Tribunal Status

Not yet under tribunal but part of broader Mahadayi issue

Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal (MWDT) verdict in 2018

Clearances Required

Awaiting Environmental Clearance (EC)
Public hearings demanded

ECs were initially denied; conditional approval given in 2022

Project Status (2025)

In early phase; highly contested on ecological/religious grounds

Partially constructed; facing SC monitored legal scrutiny

Strategic Concerns

Risk of setting precedence for new diversions

Seen as a test case for Karnataka claim over Mahadayi waters

Inter-State Conflict Potential

Moderate; not directly involved in tribunal case yet

High; central to Karnataka-Goa-Maharashtra water dispute

Constitutional Provisions on Inter-State Rivers Key Central Laws Applicable to Water Diversion Projects

Provision

Details

Article 262

Empowers Parliament to adjudicate disputes relating to inter state rivers & bars Supreme Court jurisdiction if such law is made.

Seventh Schedule

Water is in State List (Entry 17) but inter-state rivers fall under Union jurisdiction (Entry 56, Union List).

Article 21

Right to a clean & healthy environment as part of Right to Life

Key Central Laws Applicable to Water Diversion Projects

Act

Relevance to River Projects

Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956

Enables creation of tribunals to resolve water disputes.
Led to Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal (MWDT)

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

Umbrella law for environmental regulation
Used to enforce EIA norms & Eco-sensitive zone protections

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

Mandatory for diversion of forest land
Requires approval from MoEFCC

Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

Projects near/within sanctuaries or national parks (e.g. Bhimgad WLS, Mhadei WLS) need special clearances

Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

Regulates water pollution River diversion impacts fall under its scope

Biological Diversity Act, 2002

Governs access to biodiversity rich areas like Western Ghats

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013

Governs land acquisition, public consultation & fair compensation

Environmental Clearances & EIA Norms

Clearance Type

Agency

Applicability

Environmental Clearance (EC)

MoEFCC

Required for irrigation, hydro & river linking projects

Forest Clearance (FC)

MoEFCC

Needed if forest land is being diverted

Wildlife Clearance

National Board for Wildlife (NBWL)

If within 10 km of protected areas like Bhimgad or Mhadei

Public Hearing

State Pollution Control Board

Compulsory under EIA Notification, 2006 for Category A/B1 projects

Judicial Doctrines & NGT Interventions

Doctrine

Explanation & Use

Precautionary Principle

Act to prevent environmental harm even without full scientific certainty

Polluter Pays Principle

Those who degrade environment must bear remediation costs

Sustainable Development

Balance between development & ecological integrity

Doctrine of Public Trust

State is trustee of natural resources cannot arbitrarily transfer or divert

NGT (National Green Tribunal)

Quasi judicial body for fast track environmental cases
Has jurisdiction over EIA, forest & biodiversity issues

Landmark Cases

Case

Significance

Karnataka vs Goa (Mahadayi Dispute)

Led to formation of MWDT landmark for inter state river water adjudication

TN Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996)

Reinforced strict forest diversion norms

M.C. Mehta cases

Strengthened environmental jurisprudence under Article 21

Samatha vs State of Andhra Pradesh (1997)

Reinforced tribal rights in ecologically sensitive areas

For more such articles, please visit IAS GYAN

Sources:

TOI

PRACTICE QUESTION

Q. Mahadayi river dispute exemplifies challenges of inter state water sharing in ecologically sensitive regions. Discuss.

Free access to e-paper and WhatsApp updates

Let's Get In Touch!