Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
Bandura Nala project in Karnataka Mahadayi River basin faces strong opposition from environmentalists, religious figures & local communities due to concerns over ecological degradation & alleged irregularities in land acquisition processes.
Aspect |
Details |
Location |
Near Bandur, Karnataka in Mahadayi (Mandovi) River Basin |
Type |
Water diversion & irrigation project |
Executing Authority |
Karnataka Water Resources Department |
Purpose |
To divert water from Bandura stream to meet irrigation & drinking water needs in drought prone areas of Karnataka |
Components |
Diversion weirs |
Estimated Cost |
Not publicly available; part of broader Mahadayi river projects |
Opposition |
Environmentalists Fear of ecosystem damage |
Main Issues Raised |
Lack of proper environmental clearance |
Current Status (2025) |
Controversial Opposition mounting; legal & public pressure increasing |
Legislative Reference |
Related to broader Mahadayi river water dispute under Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956 |
Parameter |
Details |
Local Names |
Mahadayi in Karnataka |
Origin |
Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats near Khanapur Taluk, Belagavi district, Karnataka |
Length |
~111 km |
Total Basin Area |
~2032 sq km |
States Covered |
Karnataka (origin) |
Discharge Location |
Arabian Sea, near Panaji, Goa |
Drainage Type |
Seasonal river with high monsoon flow |
Terrain |
Originates in high elevation forested hills; traverses rugged terrain, plateaus & estuarine plains |
Ecoregions Crossed |
Western Ghats moist deciduous & evergreen forests |
Tributary Name |
Side |
Origin & Notes |
Kalasa Nala |
Left bank |
From Kanakumbi region in Karnataka; involved in Kalasa Banduri Nala Project |
Bandura Nala |
Left bank |
Originates near Bandur in Karnataka; proposed diversion is under Bandura Nala Project |
Surla River |
Right bank |
Originates in Maharashtra; joins Mahadayi in Goa |
Bhandura Nala |
Left bank |
Lesser-known tributary contributing in upstream region |
Par River |
Left bank |
Seasonal tributary contributing to flow in Karnataka segment |
Valvanti River |
Right bank |
Drains northern Goa & joins near Sattari |
Zarme, Poriem, Ragoda |
Right bank |
Short streams in Goa; enhance flow during monsoons |
Ecological & Hydrological Importance
Aspect |
Details |
Sanctuaries in Basin |
Bhimgad WLS (Karnataka) |
Flora & Fauna |
Rich in endemic & endangered species: tigers, leopards, lion tailed macaques |
UNESCO Significance |
Part of Western Ghats a UNESCO World Heritage Site |
Estuarine Importance |
Mandovi forms vital Goan estuaries, rich in fisheries & mangroves |
Monsoon Dependency |
Over 90% of flow occurs during monsoon (June–September) |
Threats |
Deforestation |
Component |
Details |
Dispute Focus |
Karnataka attempt to divert 7.56 TMC water from Mahadayi basin |
Projects Involved |
Kalasa Nala Diversion |
Goa's Argument |
River is lifeline; diversion reduces ecological flow & threatens biodiversity |
Tribunal Formation |
Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal (MWDT), 2010 |
Tribunal Verdict |
In 2018 allowed Karnataka limited diversion, challenged by Goa |
Supreme Court Status |
Pending appeals; matter sub judice |
Feature |
Bandura Nala Project |
Kalasa-Banduri Nala Project |
Location |
Bandur region, Khanapur Taluk, Belagavi district, Karnataka |
Near Kanakumbi (Kalasa) & Kankumbi (Banduri), Belagavi, Karnataka |
Target Tributary |
Bandura Nala a small tributary of Mahadayi River |
Kalasa & Banduri Nalas both tributaries of Mahadayi River |
Purpose |
Water diversion for drinking & irrigation in nearby taluks |
Primarily for drinking water supply to Hubballi-Dharwad, Bailhongal & Nargund |
Estimated Water to be Diverted |
Approx. 2–3 TMC (est. not officially stated) |
7.56 TMC (Tribunal allocation in 2018) |
Environmental Concerns |
Proximity to Bhimgad WLS |
Falls within Eco-sensitive zone of Western Ghats |
Protests/Opposition |
Strong opposition by environmentalists, religious leaders & locals |
Prolonged protests by Goa govt, activists & green groups |
Legal/Tribunal Status |
Not yet under tribunal but part of broader Mahadayi issue |
Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal (MWDT) verdict in 2018 |
Clearances Required |
Awaiting Environmental Clearance (EC) |
ECs were initially denied; conditional approval given in 2022 |
Project Status (2025) |
In early phase; highly contested on ecological/religious grounds |
Partially constructed; facing SC monitored legal scrutiny |
Strategic Concerns |
Risk of setting precedence for new diversions |
Seen as a test case for Karnataka claim over Mahadayi waters |
Inter-State Conflict Potential |
Moderate; not directly involved in tribunal case yet |
High; central to Karnataka-Goa-Maharashtra water dispute |
Provision |
Details |
Article 262 |
Empowers Parliament to adjudicate disputes relating to inter state rivers & bars Supreme Court jurisdiction if such law is made. |
Seventh Schedule |
Water is in State List (Entry 17) but inter-state rivers fall under Union jurisdiction (Entry 56, Union List). |
Article 21 |
Right to a clean & healthy environment as part of Right to Life |
Act |
Relevance to River Projects |
Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 |
Enables creation of tribunals to resolve water disputes. |
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 |
Umbrella law for environmental regulation |
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 |
Mandatory for diversion of forest land |
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 |
Projects near/within sanctuaries or national parks (e.g. Bhimgad WLS, Mhadei WLS) need special clearances |
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 |
Regulates water pollution River diversion impacts fall under its scope |
Biological Diversity Act, 2002 |
Governs access to biodiversity rich areas like Western Ghats |
Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 |
Governs land acquisition, public consultation & fair compensation |
Clearance Type |
Agency |
Applicability |
Environmental Clearance (EC) |
MoEFCC |
Required for irrigation, hydro & river linking projects |
Forest Clearance (FC) |
MoEFCC |
Needed if forest land is being diverted |
Wildlife Clearance |
National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) |
If within 10 km of protected areas like Bhimgad or Mhadei |
Public Hearing |
State Pollution Control Board |
Compulsory under EIA Notification, 2006 for Category A/B1 projects |
Judicial Doctrines & NGT Interventions
Doctrine |
Explanation & Use |
Precautionary Principle |
Act to prevent environmental harm even without full scientific certainty |
Polluter Pays Principle |
Those who degrade environment must bear remediation costs |
Sustainable Development |
Balance between development & ecological integrity |
Doctrine of Public Trust |
State is trustee of natural resources cannot arbitrarily transfer or divert |
NGT (National Green Tribunal) |
Quasi judicial body for fast track environmental cases |
Case |
Significance |
Karnataka vs Goa (Mahadayi Dispute) |
Led to formation of MWDT landmark for inter state river water adjudication |
TN Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (1996) |
Reinforced strict forest diversion norms |
M.C. Mehta cases |
Strengthened environmental jurisprudence under Article 21 |
Samatha vs State of Andhra Pradesh (1997) |
Reinforced tribal rights in ecologically sensitive areas |
For more such articles, please visit IAS GYAN
Sources:
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Mahadayi river dispute exemplifies challenges of inter state water sharing in ecologically sensitive regions. Discuss. |
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved