Free Courses Sale ends Soon, Get It Now
Source: DOWNTOEARTH
Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
The development of a new structural battery material by scientists at Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden has the potential to revolutionize electric vehicles (EVs) and portable electronics.
By integrating energy storage into the structural components of vehicles this technology promises a 70% increase in EV range and significant reductions in overall weight.
Read about electric vehicles: https://www.iasgyan.in/blogs/electric-vehicles-22
Read about types of electric vehicle batteries: https://www.iasgyan.in/daily-current-affairs/types-of-electric-vehicle-batteries
Feature |
Details |
Material Composition |
Made of carbon fiber composite with tensile strength similar to aluminum. |
Dual Functionality |
Stores energy like a battery. Functions as a structural component reducing weight. |
Energy Density |
30 Watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg). |
Efficiency Trade-off |
While lower in energy density compared to traditional batteries, it offsets with structural integration. |
Battery Type |
Energy Density (Wh/kg) |
Primary Use |
Key Limitations |
New Structural Battery |
30 |
Energy storage and structural support |
Lower energy density than existing technologies. |
Nickel-Manganese-Cobalt (NMC) |
150–250 |
High-energy storage |
Requires additional heavy casings and systems. |
Lithium-Iron-Phosphate (LFP) |
90–160 |
Long life span and thermal stability |
Heavier due to additional structural requirements. |
Traditional EV batteries account for 25% of total vehicle weight. By integrating energy storage into the structural frame overall weight can be drastically reduced.
Reduced weight leads to improved efficiency potentially increasing the driving range.
Eliminates the need for external casings, cables and management systems streamlining battery design.
Supports both energy storage and load-bearing maximizing the utility of each component.
Device |
Impact of Structural Batteries |
Laptops |
Potential weight reduction by 50% leading to more portable designs. |
Smartphones |
Could be as slim as a credit card revolutionizing mobile device design. |
Drones |
Lightweight batteries could enhance flight time and efficiency. |
Challenge |
Explanation |
Energy Density Limitations |
At 30 Wh/kg it remains significantly lower than traditional lithium-ion batteries. |
Manufacturing Scalability |
Requires new production methods and infrastructure for large-scale implementation. |
Durability Testing |
Needs extensive testing to ensure safety and longevity under diverse conditions. |
Aspect |
Traditional EVs |
With Structural Batteries |
Weight |
Heavier due to standalone battery packs and casings. |
Lighter due to integration into vehicle structure. |
Design Complexity |
Requires additional components like management systems. |
Streamlined design with reduced components. |
Range |
Limited by traditional battery capacities. |
Extended. |
The structural battery material represents a transformative advancement in EV technology. By doubling as a load-bearing frame it offers a holistic solution to reduce weight and increase range.
Sources:
PRACTICE QUESTION Q:With reference to the types of batteries consider the following statements:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2 and 3 only (c) 1 and 2 only (d) 1, 2, and 3 Answer: (a) Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in electronics and EVs because of their high energy density and ability to recharge multiple times. Statement 2 is incorrect. Solid-state batteries use solid electrolytes, not liquid and are more stable than lithium-ion batteries with reduced risks of overheating and fires. Statement 3 is correct. Structural batteries integrate energy storage with structural support potentially revolutionizing the design of EVs by reducing weight and increasing range. |
© 2024 iasgyan. All right reserved