OTTAWA CONVENTION

Last Updated on 7th April, 2025
6 minutes, 15 seconds

Description

Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.

Context

Several NATO countries bordering Russia including Poland, Finland and the Baltic states like Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have recently announced their intention to withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty of 1997 banning the use of anti personnel landmines.

This decision comes amidst growing security threats following Russia's aggression in Ukraine and signals a shift in global disarmament norms.

What is the Ottawa Treaty?

Full nameConvention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction.

Adopted in 1997.

Entered into force in 1999.

164 states are parties as of 2024.

Key provisions:

Prohibit use, production, transfer and stockpiling of anti-personnel landmines.

Destroy existing stockpiles within 4 years.

Clear mined areas and assist victims.

Significance of Withdrawal

These nations can now resume production, stockpiling and use of anti-personnel landmines.

Reversal of decades of humanitarian and disarmament efforts.

Undermines global consensus on banning indiscriminate weapons.

Reasons for Withdrawal

Factor

Explanation

Security Threats from Russia

Perceived vulnerability post-Ukraine invasion; fear of Russian expansionism.

Strategic Parity

Russia, US, China, India and Israel are non-signatories; withdrawal levels the playing field.

Military Utility

APLs seen as cost-effective tools for border defence delaying enemy advancement.

Funding Cuts

US slashed support for global demining programs; weakened treaty implementation.

Changing Geo-Politics

Increased militarization and declining emphasis on post-Cold War disarmament ideals.

Humanitarian Concerns

Over 80% of mine victims are civilians.

Mines cause long-term harm, even after wars end — hindering agriculture, displacement, and infrastructure rebuilding.

Ukraine has become the most mined country globally (UN Report, Oct 2024). 1,286 civilian victims reported as of Aug 2024.

Impact on Global Disarmament

Area

Potential Consequence

 Global Norms

Weakens international disarmament architecture.

Trust in Treaties

Raises doubts about the credibility and durability of arms control agreements.

Humanitarian Work

Demining efforts stalled due to reduced funding and increased use.

Spread of Cluster Munitions

Lithuania and others considering withdrawal from 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions as well.

India’s Position

India is not a signatory to the Ottawa Treaty.

Justification:

Security concerns in border areas especially with Pakistan.

Believes in responsible use of landmines in accordance with Amended Protocol II of the CCW (Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons).

Way Forward

Reaffirm international commitment to humanitarian disarmament.

Strengthen diplomatic and military deterrence without resorting to indiscriminate weapons.

Enhance victim assistance and global demining funding.

Encourage universalization and compliance mechanisms under existing treaties.

About Landmines

Aspect

Details

Definition

Explosive devices placed under or on the ground, designed to destroy or disable enemy targets especially personnel or vehicles.

Types

1. Anti-personnel mines – Target individuals (e.g., toe-popper).
2. Anti-tank mines – Target vehicles.
3. Improvised mines – Locally made.

Purpose

Used in warfare to deny area access, protect strategic zones, slow enemy movement or defend borders.

Activation Mechanism

Triggered by pressure, tripwires or remote signals.

Longevity

Remain active for years or decades after conflicts causing civilian harm long after wars end.

Global Scenario

Aspect

Details

Major Affected Countries

Afghanistan, Angola, Cambodia, Colombia, Iraq, Myanmar, Sudan, Syria

Landmine Monitor

Annual report published by the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)

Casualties

Mostly civilians; significant number are women and children

Clearance Challenges

Difficult terrain, lack of records, cost-intensive technology

Landmines in India

Aspect

Details

Usage

Mainly along India-Pakistan and India-China borders especially in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh

Producers

Ordnance Factories under Ministry of Defence

Challenges

Accidental injuries to civilians and soldiers during peacetime

De-mining Efforts

Carried out by Indian Army in conflict-prone and border areas

Ban & Conventions

Treaty/Agreement

Details

Ottawa Treaty (1997)

Formally called the Mine Ban Treaty, prohibits use, stockpiling, production & transfer of anti-personnel landmines

India's Position

Not a signatory to the Ottawa Treaty

Reason for India's Non-signing

Security concerns on borders; demands credible alternatives before committing

Other Non-signatories

USA, Russia, China, Pakistan

Landmine Clearance Techniques

Method

Description

Manual Clearance

Using metal detectors and trained personnel (slow but precise)

Mechanical Clearance

Using mine plows, rollers, and flails mounted on vehicles

Animal Detection

Specially trained dogs or rats (e.g., HeroRATs in Africa)

Advanced Technologies

Drones, ground-penetrating radar, and AI-based mapping

Sources:

INDIANEXPRESS

PRACTICE QUESTION

Q. Several NATO countries are withdrawing from the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel landmines. Examine the reasons behind this move and discuss its implications for international humanitarian law and global disarmament efforts. 250 Words.

Free access to e-paper and WhatsApp updates

Let's Get In Touch!