Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
Several NATO countries bordering Russia including Poland, Finland and the Baltic states like Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have recently announced their intention to withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty of 1997 banning the use of anti personnel landmines.
This decision comes amidst growing security threats following Russia's aggression in Ukraine and signals a shift in global disarmament norms.
Full name: Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction.
Adopted in 1997.
Entered into force in 1999.
164 states are parties as of 2024.
Key provisions:
Prohibit use, production, transfer and stockpiling of anti-personnel landmines.
Destroy existing stockpiles within 4 years.
Clear mined areas and assist victims.
These nations can now resume production, stockpiling and use of anti-personnel landmines.
Reversal of decades of humanitarian and disarmament efforts.
Undermines global consensus on banning indiscriminate weapons.
Factor |
Explanation |
Security Threats from Russia |
Perceived vulnerability post-Ukraine invasion; fear of Russian expansionism. |
Strategic Parity |
Russia, US, China, India and Israel are non-signatories; withdrawal levels the playing field. |
Military Utility |
APLs seen as cost-effective tools for border defence delaying enemy advancement. |
Funding Cuts |
US slashed support for global demining programs; weakened treaty implementation. |
Changing Geo-Politics |
Increased militarization and declining emphasis on post-Cold War disarmament ideals. |
Over 80% of mine victims are civilians.
Mines cause long-term harm, even after wars end — hindering agriculture, displacement, and infrastructure rebuilding.
Ukraine has become the most mined country globally (UN Report, Oct 2024). 1,286 civilian victims reported as of Aug 2024.
Area |
Potential Consequence |
Global Norms |
Weakens international disarmament architecture. |
Trust in Treaties |
Raises doubts about the credibility and durability of arms control agreements. |
Humanitarian Work |
Demining efforts stalled due to reduced funding and increased use. |
Spread of Cluster Munitions |
Lithuania and others considering withdrawal from 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions as well. |
India is not a signatory to the Ottawa Treaty.
Justification:
Security concerns in border areas especially with Pakistan.
Believes in responsible use of landmines in accordance with Amended Protocol II of the CCW (Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons).
Reaffirm international commitment to humanitarian disarmament.
Strengthen diplomatic and military deterrence without resorting to indiscriminate weapons.
Enhance victim assistance and global demining funding.
Encourage universalization and compliance mechanisms under existing treaties.
Aspect |
Details |
Definition |
Explosive devices placed under or on the ground, designed to destroy or disable enemy targets especially personnel or vehicles. |
Types |
1. Anti-personnel mines – Target individuals (e.g., toe-popper). |
Purpose |
Used in warfare to deny area access, protect strategic zones, slow enemy movement or defend borders. |
Activation Mechanism |
Triggered by pressure, tripwires or remote signals. |
Longevity |
Remain active for years or decades after conflicts causing civilian harm long after wars end. |
Global Scenario
Aspect |
Details |
Major Affected Countries |
Afghanistan, Angola, Cambodia, Colombia, Iraq, Myanmar, Sudan, Syria |
Landmine Monitor |
Annual report published by the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) |
Casualties |
Mostly civilians; significant number are women and children |
Clearance Challenges |
Difficult terrain, lack of records, cost-intensive technology |
Landmines in India
Aspect |
Details |
Usage |
Mainly along India-Pakistan and India-China borders especially in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh |
Producers |
Ordnance Factories under Ministry of Defence |
Challenges |
Accidental injuries to civilians and soldiers during peacetime |
De-mining Efforts |
Carried out by Indian Army in conflict-prone and border areas |
Ban & Conventions
Treaty/Agreement |
Details |
Ottawa Treaty (1997) |
Formally called the Mine Ban Treaty, prohibits use, stockpiling, production & transfer of anti-personnel landmines |
India's Position |
Not a signatory to the Ottawa Treaty |
Reason for India's Non-signing |
Security concerns on borders; demands credible alternatives before committing |
Other Non-signatories |
USA, Russia, China, Pakistan |
Landmine Clearance Techniques
Method |
Description |
Manual Clearance |
Using metal detectors and trained personnel (slow but precise) |
Mechanical Clearance |
Using mine plows, rollers, and flails mounted on vehicles |
Animal Detection |
Specially trained dogs or rats (e.g., HeroRATs in Africa) |
Advanced Technologies |
Drones, ground-penetrating radar, and AI-based mapping |
Sources:
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Several NATO countries are withdrawing from the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel landmines. Examine the reasons behind this move and discuss its implications for international humanitarian law and global disarmament efforts. 250 Words. |
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved