Source: NHPC INDIA
Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
Parbati-II project is a crucial hydropower initiative by NHPC in Himachal Pradesh aiming to enhance Indian renewable energy capacity & mitigate flood risks despite significant delays & engineering challenges.
Parameter |
Details |
Project Name |
Parbati II Hydroelectric Project |
Type |
Run of river hydroelectric scheme |
River |
Parbati River |
Location |
District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh |
Approach |
Nearest Railhead Kiratpur; Nearest Airport Bhuntar (Kullu) |
Installed Capacity |
800 MW (4 × 200 MW) |
Design Energy |
3124.6 Million Units (MU) (90% dependable year) |
Project Cost |
₹3,919.59 Crores (at December 2001 price level) |
Beneficiary States/UTs |
Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh & Union Territory of Chandigarh |
Purpose |
Hydropower generation & flood mitigation |
Dam Type |
Concrete Gravity Dam |
Dam Height |
83.7 meters |
Water Diversion Mechanism |
The river is diverted at Pulga village in Parbati Valley through a 31.52 km-long Head Race Tunnel (HRT) |
Powerhouse Location |
Suind village in Sainj Valley |
Gross Head Utilized |
863 meters (Pulga to Suind) |
Additional Water Sources |
Various nallahs along Head Race Tunnel alignment contribute to water diversion |
Surge Shaft |
130 m high, 17 m diameter Orifice-type surge shaft |
Head Race Tunnel (HRT) |
31.52 km long, 6 m diameter tunnel |
Pressure Shafts |
2 pressure shafts of 3.5 m diameter each |
Length of Pressure Shafts |
Right - 2,121.5 m; Left - 2,149.5 m |
Tail Race Channels |
4 channels, 60m long, dimensions 5m × 4.5m each |
Powerhouse Type |
Surface powerhouse |
Turbine Type |
Pelton Turbines |
Number of Generating Units |
4 units of 200 MW each |
Switchyard |
400 KV GIS Surface Switchyard with 2 outgoing 400 KV feeders |
Challenges Faced |
Geological difficulties, tunneling issues, silt seepage, flash floods & water ingress delays |
Annual Energy Generation |
Approximately 3,074 MU per year |
Significance |
Major contributor to renewable energy, hydropower production & flood risk mitigation along Parbati River |
Parameter |
Details |
Full Name |
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) Limited |
Established |
1975 |
Headquarters |
Faridabad, Haryana, India |
Ownership |
Government of India (Public Sector Undertaking) |
Sector |
Hydropower & Renewable Energy |
Primary Role |
Development of hydroelectric power projects in India |
Total Installed Capacity |
7,097.2 MW (as of 2023) |
Number of Power Stations |
24 Hydro, 1 Solar, 1 Wind |
Key Hydroelectric Projects |
Teesta-V (Sikkim), Dhauliganga (Uttarakhand), Subansiri Lower (Arunachal Pradesh/Assam), Chamera (Himachal Pradesh), Parbati-II (Himachal Pradesh), Salal (J&K) |
Total Projects Under Construction |
16 projects (with a total capacity of 10,789 MW) |
Major International Ventures |
Bhutan (Punatsangchhu-I & II, Mangdechhu HEP) |
Diversification into Renewables |
Expanding into solar & wind energy projects |
Significance in India's Power Sector |
One of India’s largest hydropower developers, crucial for renewable energy transition |
Market Listing |
Listed on BSE & NSE (Stock Exchange) |
Government Stake |
Majority ownership with Government of India |
Vision |
Sustainable energy development with an emphasis on hydro & renewable sources |
Parameter |
Details |
Location |
Himachal Pradesh, India |
Origin |
Near Mantalai Glacier in Pin Parbati Pass (Kullu district, Himachal Pradesh) |
Length |
90 km (approximate) |
Elevation of Source |
Around 5,200 meters (17,060 feet) above sea level |
Major Tributaries |
Tos Nala, Dibibokri Nala, Malana Nala |
Passes Along Course |
Pin Parbati Pass (connects Kullu & Spiti Valley) |
Flow Through |
Manikaran, Kasol, Pulga, Bhuntar (Kullu) |
Confluence |
Joins Beas River near Bhuntar in Kullu district |
Hydroelectric Projects |
Parbati Hydroelectric Projects (Stages I, II & III) |
Parbati-II Project Details |
Utilizes water diversion at Pulga to Suind with an 800 MW power generation capacity |
Religious Significance |
Manikaran Sahib (Sikh pilgrimage site) & Hot Water Springs along river banks |
Tourism Importance |
Kasol, Tosh, Kheerganga Trek, Manikaran attract trekkers & tourists |
Environmental Challenges |
Flash floods, landslides, deforestation, hydropower project impact |
Ecological Importance |
Home to alpine forests, rich biodiversity & snow-fed streams crucial for Himalayan ecosystems |
Type of hydropower generation that utilizes natural flow & elevation drop of a river to generate electricity without creating a large reservoir or significant water storage.
Feature |
Details |
Water Storage |
Minimal or no storage; relies on river's natural flow. |
Reservoir |
No large reservoir; only a small pondage to regulate short term fluctuations. |
Environmental Impact |
Lower ecological impact compared to large dams but may affect aquatic ecosystems & sediment transport. |
Working Mechanism |
Diverts river water through a headrace tunnel/channel → Water flows through turbines → Electricity generated → Water returns to river downstream. |
Energy Dependence |
Highly dependent on river discharge (seasonal variations affect power generation). |
Ideal Locations |
Mountainous & hilly regions with steep gradients for natural elevation drop. |
Advantages |
Minimal displacement of people, reduced risk of dam failure & lower carbon footprint. |
Challenges |
Seasonal flow variations, silt accumulation, limited power regulation & potential ecological concerns. |
Project Name |
River |
Capacity |
State |
Parbati-II |
Parbati |
800 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
Karcham Wangtoo |
Satluj |
1,200 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
Rampur HEP |
Satluj |
412 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
Teesta-III |
Teesta |
1,200 MW |
Sikkim |
Teesta-V |
Teesta |
510 MW |
Sikkim |
Lower Subansiri |
Subansiri |
2,000 MW |
Arunachal Pradesh/Assam |
Uri-I & Uri-II |
Jhelum |
480 MW |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Dhauliganga HEP |
Dhauliganga |
280 MW |
Uttarakhand |
Baglihar Hydroelectric Project |
Chenab |
900 MW |
Jammu & Kashmir |
Chamera-III |
Ravi |
231 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
Project Name |
River |
Country |
Capacity |
Three Gorges Dam (RoR Component) |
Yangtze |
China |
22,500 MW |
Belo Monte Dam |
Xingu |
Brazil |
11,233 MW |
La Yesca Dam |
Santiago |
Mexico |
750 MW |
Mica Dam |
Columbia |
Canada |
2,805 MW |
Jinping-I Dam |
Yalong |
China |
3,600 MW |
For more information, please refer to IAS GYAN
Sources: CNBC TV18
PRACTICE QUESTION Q.Discuss significance of Run-of-River (RoR) hydroelectric projects in Indian renewable energy sector. Highlight their advantages, challenges & compare them with conventional dam-based hydropower projects. |
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved