UNESCO List of World Heritage Sites in Danger
Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
Context
- The Saint Hilarion complex, one of the oldest monasteries in the Middle East, has been put on the UNESCO list of World Heritage sites in danger due to the war in Gaza.
MUST READ ARTICLES ON WORLD HERITAGE SITES:
https://www.iasgyan.in/daily-current-affairs/world-heritage-sites-47
https://www.iasgyan.in/daily-current-affairs/world-heritage-site
Saint Hilarion Monastery Saint Hilarion Monastery, located at the archaeological site of Tell Umm el-'Amr near Deir al-Balah in the Gaza Strip, Palestine, is an ancient Christian monastery established around 340 CE. Founded by Hilarion, a native of the Gaza region and a significant figure in Palestinian monasticism, the monastery's origins are tied to Hilarion's conversion to Christianity and his subsequent hermitage inspired by St. Anthony. The site features remnants spanning from the Late Roman to the Umayyad period, including five successive churches, bath and sanctuary complexes, geometric mosaics, and an expansive crypt. The early hermitage, consisting of small cells made from perishable materials, has not survived. Abandoned after a seventh-century earthquake, the site was rediscovered by local archaeologists in 1999. Local tradition and 19th-century Western travelers indicate that the monastery's prayer hall may now be occupied by the Mosque of al-Khidr, with marble columns possibly from the Byzantine-era monastery.The Ministry of Tourism in Gaza reported that the monastery was in urgent need of preservation, a challenge exacerbated by regional conflict and lack of resources. The site was listed on the 2012 World Monuments Watch and classified as "Rescue Needed" by the Global Heritage Network. In December 2023, UNESCO granted the monastery "provisional enhanced protection," but in January 2024, Al Jazeera reported significant damage to the monastery due to the ongoing Israel–Hamas war. By July 2024, the monastery was added to the List of World Heritage in Danger by UNESCO. |
The List of World Heritage in Danger
- The List of World Heritage in Danger is compiled by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) through the World Heritage Committee.
- Established under Article 11.4 of the World Heritage Convention, which was created in 1972, the list identifies World Heritage Sites that are under significant threat and require major conservation efforts.
- The purpose of this list is to raise international awareness of these threats and to encourage protective measures.
Criteria for Listing
Entries on the list are those World Heritage Sites that face either proven imminent threats or potential dangers that could adversely affect their preservation.
- Natural Sites: Ascertained dangers include a serious decline in endangered species, deterioration of natural beauty, or scientific value due to human activities like logging, pollution, settlement, mining, and agriculture.
- Cultural Sites: Ascertained dangers involve serious deterioration of materials, structures, or architectural coherence, and loss of historical authenticity or cultural significance. Potential dangers for both site types include development projects, armed conflicts, inadequate management systems, or changes in legal protective status. Cultural sites may also face gradual threats from changes in geology, climate, or environment.
Inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger Under the 1972 World Heritage Convention, a World Heritage property can be inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger by the Committee if its condition meets specific criteria. These criteria are categorized into two main cases for cultural and natural properties. For Cultural Properties Ascertained Danger A cultural property may be considered to face ascertained danger if it is subjected to imminent threats, including:
Potential Danger A cultural property may be facing potential danger if it is exposed to threats that could negatively impact its inherent characteristics, such as:
For Natural Properties Ascertained Danger A natural property is considered to be in ascertained danger if it faces imminent threats such as:
Potential Danger A natural property may be deemed to face potential danger if major threats could impact its characteristics, including:
|
Assessment and Decision Process
- Before a property is added to the List of World Heritage in Danger, its condition is evaluated, and a potential corrective measures program is developed with the involved State Party.
- The final decision to inscribe a site is made by the World Heritage Committee. The committee may allocate financial support from the World Heritage Fund to help listed properties.
- The state of conservation is reviewed annually, and the committee may request additional measures, remove the property from the list if threats are mitigated, or consider removing it from both the List of World Heritage in Danger and the World Heritage List.
Procedures and Considerations
Development of Corrective Measures
- Once a site is inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, the World Heritage Committee works with the State Party to develop and adopt a program for corrective measures.
- The Committee also monitors the site’s situation to ensure that efforts are made to restore its values and remove it from the danger list as soon as possible.
Perceptions and Reactions
- The inscription of a site on the danger list is not universally perceived in the same way.
- Some countries apply for inscription to draw international attention and obtain expert help, while others may view it as a negative mark.
- It should be understood as a mechanism to address specific conservation needs rather than a sanction.
Deletion from the Lists
- If a site loses the characteristics that led to its inscription on the World Heritage List, the Committee may decide to remove it from both the List of World Heritage in Danger and the World Heritage List. This provision has been applied twice in the history of the Convention.
- Several sites have been delisted after being placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, including the Dresden Elbe Valley and the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City.
- The Arabian Oryx Sanctuary was delisted directly. Some sites, such as the Church of the Nativity, were designated as World Heritage Sites and placed on the danger list within the same year.
Benefits of Inscription
Immediate Assistance
- Inscribing a site on the List of World Heritage in Danger enables the World Heritage Committee to provide immediate assistance from the World Heritage Fund to help address the threats facing the property.
International Awareness
- The listing serves to alert the international community to the endangered status of the site, encouraging collective efforts to address the issues and preserve the property.
Conservation Response
- The prospect of inscription can prompt rapid conservation actions. The listing facilitates a targeted response to specific preservation needs, often leading to effective interventions.
Impact and Criticisms
- In some cases, listing a site as endangered has led to successful conservation efforts and funding, as seen with the Galápagos Islands and Yellowstone National Park.
- However, the list and UNESCO’s implementation have faced criticism. States Parties and other stakeholders have questioned the authority of the Committee to list a site as endangered without their consent.
- Historically, States Parties would submit corrective measures before a site could be listed.
- Critics argue that the list is sometimes used politically and that long-term listings may not always be the best conservation approach.
- The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has noted that UNESCO has referenced the danger list in some cases where threats could be addressed by the State Party without formal listing.
Current Status
- As of April 2024, there are 56 entries on the List of World Heritage in Danger, comprising 16 natural and 40 cultural sites.
- These sites are distributed across UNESCO regions as follows: 23 in the Arab States, 14 in Africa, 6 in Latin America and the Caribbean, 6 in Asia and the Pacific, and 7 in Europe and North America.
- The majority of endangered natural sites (11) are located in Africa.
- Many of the endangered sites face threats from natural disasters, armed conflict, neglect, pollution, and unsustainable tourism.
- Notable examples include Syria, with sites like the Ancient City of Aleppo and the Ancient Villages of Northern Syria affected by the Syrian Civil War, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where military conflict and environmental degradation threaten several national parks.
UNESCO LIST OF WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN DANGER
No. |
Name |
Location |
Criteria |
Year (WHS) |
Endangered |
Reason |
1 |
Abu Mena |
Abusir, Egypt |
Cultural: (iv) |
1979 |
2001– |
Cave-ins due to clay becoming semi-liquid when exposed to excess water |
2 |
Air and Ténéré Natural Reserves |
Arlit Department, Niger |
Natural: (vii), (ix), (x) |
1991 |
1992– |
Jihadist insurgency, civil disturbance, reduction in wildlife, and vegetation degradation |
3 |
Ancient City of Aleppo |
Aleppo Governorate, Syria |
Cultural: (iii), (iv) |
1986 |
2013– |
Syrian Civil War, bombings threatening the site |
4 |
Ancient City of Bosra |
Daraa Governorate, Syria |
Cultural: (i), (iii), (vi) |
1980 |
2013– |
Syrian Civil War |
5 |
Ancient City of Damascus |
Damascus Governorate, Syria |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi) |
1979 |
2013– |
Syrian Civil War, rebel gunfire, mortar shelling |
6 |
Ancient Villages of Northern Syria |
Syria |
Cultural: (iii), (iv), (v) |
2011 |
2013– |
Syrian Civil War, looting and demolitions by Islamist groups |
7 |
Archaeological Site of Cyrene |
Jebel Akhdar, Libya |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (vi) |
1982 |
2016– |
Libyan Civil War, presence of armed groups |
8 |
Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna |
Khoms, Libya |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iii) |
1982 |
2016– |
Libyan Civil War, presence of armed groups |
9 |
Archaeological Site of Sabratha |
Sabratha, Libya |
Cultural: (iii) |
1982 |
2016– |
Libyan Civil War, presence of armed groups |
10 |
Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) |
Salah ad Din, Iraq |
Cultural: (iii), (iv) |
2003 |
2003– |
Planned reservoir suspended; lack of protection |
11 |
Chan Chan Archaeological Zone |
La Libertad, Peru |
Cultural: (i), (iii) |
1986 |
1986– |
Natural erosion |
12 |
City of Potosí |
Potosí, Bolivia |
Cultural: (ii), (iv), (vi) |
1987 |
2014– |
Mining causing instability, further mining threats |
13 |
Coro and its Port |
Falcón, Venezuela |
Cultural: (iv), (v) |
1993 |
2005– |
Damage due to heavy rain and construction in buffer zone |
14 |
Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din |
Homs and Latakia Governorates, Syria |
Cultural: (ii), (iv) |
2006 |
2013– |
Syrian Civil War, damage and looting by Islamist groups |
15 |
Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley |
Bamyan, Afghanistan |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi) |
2003 |
2003– |
Abandonment, military action, dynamite explosions |
16 |
East Rennell |
Rennell and Bellona Province, Solomon Islands |
Natural: (ix) |
1998 |
2013– |
Logging and its effect on local ecosystem |
17 |
Everglades National Park |
Florida, United States |
Natural: (viii), (ix), (x) |
1979 |
1993–2007, 2010– |
Damage from Hurricane Andrew, water flow deterioration, marine habitat loss |
18 |
Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo |
Colón Province, Panama |
Cultural: (i), (iv) |
1980 |
2012– |
Environmental factors, lack of maintenance, urban development |
19 |
Garamba National Park |
Orientale, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Natural: (vii), (x) |
1980 |
1984–1992, 1996– |
Poaching, reduction of white rhinoceros population |
20 |
Hatra |
Nineveh Governorate, Iraq |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi) |
1985 |
2015– |
Damage inflicted by the Islamic State (IS) |
21 |
Hebron |
Hebron Governorate, Palestine |
Cultural: (ii), (iv), (vi) |
2017 |
2017– |
|
22 |
Historic Centre of Odesa |
Odesa, Ukraine |
Cultural: (ii), (iv) |
2023 |
2023– |
Russo-Ukrainian War |
23 |
Kyiv: Saint-Sophia Cathedral and Related Monastic Buildings, Kyiv Pechersk Lavra |
Kyiv, Ukraine |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) |
1990 |
2023– |
Russo-Ukrainian War |
24 |
L'viv – the Ensemble of the Historic Centre |
Lviv, Ukraine |
Cultural: (ii), (v) |
1998 |
2023– |
Russo-Ukrainian War |
25 |
Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz |
Qashqadaryo Region, Uzbekistan |
Cultural: (iii), (iv) |
2000 |
2016– |
Urban development and destruction of buildings |
26 |
Historic Centre of Vienna |
Vienna, Austria |
Cultural: (ii), (iv), (vi) |
2001 |
2017– |
New high-rise projects |
27 |
Historic Town of Zabīd |
Al Hudaydah, Yemen |
Cultural: (ii), (iv), (vi) |
1993 |
2000– |
Deterioration of historic buildings |
28 |
Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California |
Baja California, Baja California Sur, Sonora, Sinaloa and Nayarit, Mexico |
Natural: (vii), (ix), (x) |
2005 |
2019– |
Imminent extinction of the vaquita |
29 |
Kahuzi-Biega National Park |
South Kivu and Maniema, Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Natural: (x) |
1980 |
1997– |
Deforestation, hunting, and war |
30 |
Lake Turkana National Parks |
Kenya |
Natural: (viii), (x) |
1997 |
2018– |
Impact of Ethiopia's Gilgel Gibe III Dam on the lake's flow and ecosystem |
31 |
Landmarks of Ancient Kingdom of Saba |
Marib, Yemen |
Cultural: (iii), (iv) |
2023 |
2023– |
Yemeni Civil War |
32 |
Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park |
Bamingui-Bangoran, Central African Republic |
Natural: (ix), (x) |
1988 |
1997– |
Illegal grazing, poaching, and security issues |
33 |
Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam |
Ghōr, Afghanistan |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (iv) |
2002 |
2002– |
Lack of legal protection, poor condition of the site |
34 |
Medieval Monuments in Kosovo |
Serbia |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (iv) |
2004 |
2006– |
March Pogrom, political instability |
35 |
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve |
Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea |
Natural: (ix), (x) |
1981 |
1992– |
Mining concession, influx of refugees |
36 |
Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia |
Temwen Island, Micronesia |
Cultural: (i), (iii), (iv), (vi) |
2016 |
2016– |
Siltation of waterways undermining structures |
37 |
Niokolo-Koba National Park |
Senegal |
Natural: (ix), (x) |
1981 |
1998–2007, 2010– |
Poaching, deforestation, and the impacts of climate change |
38 |
Old City of Dubrovnik |
Dubrovnik, Croatia |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iv) |
1979 |
1991– |
Damage from shelling during the Croatian War of Independence |
39 |
Old Town of Galle and its Fortifications |
Galle, Sri Lanka |
Cultural: (ii), (iv) |
1988 |
2012– |
Damage from the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami |
40 |
Old Walled City of Shibam |
Shibam, Yemen |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iv) |
1982 |
2004– |
Damage from floods and Yemeni Civil War |
41 |
Palmyra |
Homs Governorate, Syria |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi) |
1980 |
2013– |
Syrian Civil War, destruction by the Islamic State |
42 |
Rock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela |
Lalibela, Ethiopia |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) |
1978 |
2021– |
Armed conflicts and ethnic tensions |
43 |
San Agustín Archaeological Park |
Huila Department, Colombia |
Cultural: (i), (iii), (iv) |
1995 |
2008– |
Illegal mining operations |
44 |
San Pedro de Atacama |
Antofagasta Region, Chile |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (iv) |
2003 |
2020– |
Environmental issues due to mining and tourism |
45 |
Shiretoko |
Hokkaido, Japan |
Natural: (vii), (x) |
2005 |
2020– |
Decline in brown bear population |
46 |
The Cultural Landscape of the Chongming Dongtan Ramsar Wetland |
Chongming District, Shanghai, China |
Natural: (vii), (ix) |
2002 |
2018– |
Land reclamation and development threats |
47 |
The Old City of Merv |
Mary Province, Turkmenistan |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (iv) |
1999 |
2003– |
Preservation challenges |
48 |
The Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower |
Baku, Azerbaijan |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iv), (vi) |
2000 |
2001– |
Urban development pressures |
49 |
Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve |
Florida, United States |
Natural: (ix), (x) |
1988 |
2016– |
Impacts from coastal erosion and invasive species |
50 |
Timbuktu |
Timbuktu, Mali |
Cultural: (ii), (iv), (vi) |
1988 |
2012– |
Damage by extremist groups and local conflicts |
51 |
Tsingy de Bemaraha Strict Nature Reserve |
Melaky and Sofia, Madagascar |
Natural: (vii), (viii), (ix), (x) |
1990 |
1999– |
Illegal logging, mining, and invasive species |
52 |
Tyre |
Tyre, Lebanon |
Cultural: (ii), (iii), (vi) |
1984 |
2014– |
Looting and destruction during conflicts |
53 |
Upper Svaneti |
Svaneti, Georgia |
Cultural: (iii), (iv) |
1996 |
2000– |
Lack of proper conservation and infrastructure development |
54 |
Wadi Rum |
Ma'an Governorate, Jordan |
Natural: (vii), (x) |
2011 |
2011– |
Environmental degradation due to increased tourism |
55 |
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower |
Baku, Azerbaijan |
Cultural: (i), (ii), (iv), (vi) |
2000 |
2001– |
Urban development pressures |
56 |
Zabid |
Al Hudaydah, Yemen |
Cultural: (ii), (iv), (vi) |
1993 |
2000– |
Deterioration of historic buildings |
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. What are the criteria for listing a site on the List of World Heritage in Danger and how does this listing facilitate international conservation efforts? Illustrate your answer with a recent example |
SOURCE: THE HINDU