RIVER INTERLINKING, THE FOUNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER

10th January, 2025

This article is based on the Editorial " River interlinking, the fount of environmental disaster " that appeared in The Hindu on 9th January 2025.

Context

Recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid the foundation stone for the Ken-Betwa River Link Project.

What is India’s Rivers Interlinking Project?

The Indian rivers interlinking project is a proposed large-scale engineering initiative. It aims to link rivers through reservoirs and canals to improve irrigation, recharge groundwater, reduce floods and address water shortages.

Historical Evolution of River Interlinking in India

Early Concepts

The idea of river interlinking was proposed over 130 years ago by Sir Arthur Cotton, who designed irrigation systems in the Godavari and Krishna river valleys. This concept was later refined by M. Visvesvaraya, a prominent Indian engineer.

Modern Development

In the 1970s and 1980s, K.L. Rao and Captain Dinshaw J. Dastur expanded the idea under the name ‘National Water Grid.’ The concept resurfaced as the ‘River Interlinking Project’ (ILR) under the Ministry of Water Resources.

Establishment of NWDA

The National Water Development Agency (NWDA) was created in 1982 to:

  • Conduct feasibility studies for interlinking projects.
  • Address issues of floods and droughts.
  • Propose water transfers to deficient regions.

The NWDA identified 30 links under the National Perspective Plan, classified into 14 Himalayan and 16 Peninsular links.

Why is River Interlinking Important for India?

India has 18% of the global population but only 4% of the world's water resources.

India receives an average of 4,000 billion cubic metres of rainfall annually, concentrated in a 4-month monsoon period (June–September). Rainfall distribution is uneven, with the east and north receiving more, while the west and south receive less. This variation, combined with extreme weather events like floods during excess monsoons and droughts during deficient monsoons, exacerbates the water demand-supply gap, worsened by a rising population.

Proponents argue that river interlinking can conserve and store monsoon water in reservoirs and channel it to water-scarce areas, addressing irrigation, drinking water, and industrial demands. Additional benefits include improved transport infrastructure via navigation, hydropower generation, and enhanced rural livelihoods through fish farming.

Concerns About River Interlinking

Opponents highlight the environmental, ecological and social displacement risks. They also raise concerns about unpredictable consequences of altering natural systems and the potential for international conflicts if projects impact shared rivers.

Components of River Interlinking Project

The Indian Rivers Interlinking Project is divided into three components:

  • Himalayan Rivers Interlink Component: Focuses on linking rivers in the northern region.
  • Peninsular Rivers Interlink Component: Covers the southern region.
  • Intrastate River-Linking Component: Initiated in 2005, it focuses on linking rivers within individual states.

The project is managed by the National Water Development Agency (NWDA) under the Ministry of Jal Shakti. NWDA has conducted studies and prepared reports for:

  • 14 projects under the Himalayan component,
  • 16 projects under the peninsular component, and
  • 37 projects under the intrastate component.

Criticism of the River Interlinking Model

Flaws in the Concept

  • Overlooks eco-hydrological dimensions.
  • Misinterprets floodwaters as surplus instead of carriers of minerals for land fertility.
  • Ignores groundwater recharge and biodiversity needs.

Economic Implications

  • Project costs for the overall river interlinking initiative, will burden taxpayers.
  • Fails to account for social and operational costs.

Climate Change Considerations

  • Altered rainfall patterns and reduced river flows due to climate change exacerbate water scarcity.
  • Contradicts India’s commitments to mitigating human-induced climate change.

In a nutshell,

Merits and Demerits of Interlinking Rivers

Merits of Interlinking

Aspect

Details

Food Security

Increase in irrigated area from 113 million ha to 156 million ha by 2050, ensuring sufficient food production for India's projected 1.6 billion population.

Hydropower Development

Adds 34,000 MW of hydropower, boosting the share of hydro energy to 40%. Only 2% of northeast's potential has been developed; the project taps this resource.

Water Supply

Provides 90 billion cum for drinking water and 64.8 billion cum for industries by 2050. Reduces hardship for rural women and supports industrial growth.

Navigation

Guarantees 2m depth in national waterways year-round, easing pressure on roads and railways and facilitating inland navigation.

Flood and Drought Relief

Diverts water from flood-prone basins like Brahmaputra and Ganga to drought-hit regions in the South and West, reducing flood-drought cycles.

Employment Opportunities

Creates large-scale jobs in rural areas through agro-industry and canal projects, reducing rural-to-urban migration.

Dry Weather Flow

Ensures minimum dry season flow, aiding in pollution control, navigation, fisheries, and wildlife conservation.

Economic Benefits

Potential to double agricultural production, boost farmers' income, and unify the country by involving Panchayats.

Demerits and Challenges of Interlinking

Aspect

Details

Environmental Problems

Risks of deforestation, climate change and submergence of land. Example: Ken-Betwa project may submerge 5000 hectares of Penna Tiger Reserve.

Displacement

Causes loss of livelihood for tribal and rural communities, leading to forced displacement and cultural erosion.

High Costs

Estimated at ₹5.6 lakh crore (2000 prices), likely to escalate, diverting funds from other critical sectors.

Interstate Disputes

Water-sharing conflicts between states, e.g., Cauvery dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. Potential for more disputes with large-scale inter-basin transfers.

International Relations

Affects neighboring countries like Bangladesh and Nepal. Example: Flash floods in Arunachal Pradesh (2000) due to a dam breach in Tibet.

Social and Political Costs

Risks of social unrest and psychological impact due to resettlement. Strained ties with neighboring nations over shared river systems.

Alternatives to Addressing India’s Water Crisis

Comprehensive Watershed Management

  • Involves local communities alongside hydrologists, engineers and biologists.
  • Promotes sustainable aquifer management.

Improved Irrigation Practices

  • Adoption of drip irrigation, as seen in Israel, reduces water consumption by 25%-75%.
  • Encourages efficient use of fertilisers and pesticides.

Wastewater Reuse and Recycling

  • Development of innovative programmes to reuse wastewater.
  • Reduces dependency on river water.

Leveraging Vernacular Practices

  • Incorporating traditional watershed management techniques ensures sustainability.

Ken-Betwa River Link Project

This project is a significant step towards addressing water scarcity in the Bundelkhand region which spans across Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. This project also involves the construction of a dam within the Panna Tiger Reserve. All these spark environmental concerns. Upon completion, the project aims to connect the Ken River that is classified as water-surplus with the Betwa River which is located in drought-prone Bundelkhand.

Objectives of the Ken-Betwa River Link Project

  • To mitigate water scarcity in Bundelkhand.
  • To improve irrigation and agricultural productivity.
  • To provide drinking water to local communities.
  • To address drought conditions in central India.

Features and Components of the Ken-Betwa Project

Linking of Rivers: Connecting the Ken River to the Betwa River to transfer surplus water.

Construction of a Dam: Located within the Panna Tiger Reserve, raising ecological concerns.

Cost Estimates: Approximately ₹45,000 crore, excluding social and environmental costs.

Potential Benefits: Alleviating water stress, improving agriculture, and enhancing regional development.

Environmental Concerns

Submergence of Panna Tiger Reserve

The dam construction threatens to submerge critical areas of the Panna Tiger Reserve, impacting biodiversity and wildlife habitats.

Impact on Deltaic Ecosystems

Diverting river water starves deltaic regions, such as the Indus Delta, of essential freshwater, leading to:

  • Saltwater intrusion from the sea.
  • Decline in fertility and biodiversity.

Global Lessons

Examples such as the Aral Sea’s desiccation and the Kissimmee River disaster highlight the severe ecological consequences of river channelisation and water diversion.

Contradictions in Policy and Philosophy

Ken-Betwa River Link Project’s environmental implications contradict Indian culture that venerates rivers as sacred.

India’s rivers are increasingly under threat from pollution, excessive damming and commercial exploitation. This stark contrast raises questions about the commitment to preserve the sanctity and sustainability of the nation’s water bodies.

Conclusion

The Ken-Betwa River Link Project highlights the complexities of balancing developmental aspirations with environmental sustainability. This project aims to address water scarcity in India but its long-term impacts on ecology, biodiversity and climate resilience could be immense.

A holistic, community-driven approach to water management coupled with modern technologies, may provide more sustainable solutions to India’s water crisis.