IAS Gyan

Daily News Analysis

US grant to Nepal

30th March, 2022 International Relations

Copyright infringement is not intended

 

Context: Nepal’s Parliament ratified a $500 million grant from the United States as part of the aid agency Millennium Challenge Corporation’s Nepal compact. The funds are for road and power projects.

  • While China had asked Nepal not to ratify it calling it a ‘Pandora’s box’, the US had warned that failure to do so may lead to a review of their 75-year-old bilateral relationship.
  • As a sign of a growing bond with the US, Nepal at the United Nations General Assembly condemned Russia for its invasion on Ukraine — while India and China abstained.
  • In 2014, Nepal had abstained from voting on Russia’s annexation of Crimea.

 

Nepal changing equations with China:

  • In 2015-16 PM Oli had signed a series of framework agreements with China on trade and transit with access to the sea route, ending a monopoly arrangement with India.
  • But now, Nepal proposed revival of “joint committees” to take up border disputes.
  • Four years after Nepal had signed up to be part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), it is demanding more grants in Chinese projects than loans that could lead to a debt trap.
  • However, China is investing in the future leadership of Nepal. So its interest is long-term, and it seems determined to confront competitors, primarily the US and India.

India-Nepal Relation

 

Story so far:

  • The bilateral ties came under strain under then Prime Minister Oli after India opened an 80-km-long strategically crucial road connecting the Lipulekh pass with Dharchula in 2020.
  • Nepal protested the inauguration of the road claiming that it passed through its territory.
  • Days later, Nepal came out with a new map showing Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura as its territories.
  • India reacted sharply, calling it a "unilateral act" and cautioning that such "artificial enlargement" of territorial claims will not be acceptable to it.

 

Unchanging perspectives

  • The Nepal-India relationship has never been free of controversy as the perspectives of both sides are yet to change.
  • Nepal government amended the Nepal mapto add new territory to deflect attention from the poor management of the COVID-19 pandemic by his government.
  • Nepal wanted to discuss the map with India but the latter did not provide any time for a discussion.
  • India continues to think that by providing largesse to Nepal in the form of aid and development projects, it can win Nepali hearts.
  • But despite pouring billions of rupees into Nepal over decades, it has still not been able to do so. Therefore, it needs to reflect on what it is not doing right.

 

Two issues that need to be addressed

  • First, Indian aid is seen in Nepal as a favourbestowed on a constituency it wants to garner support from rather than a contribution to Nepal’s planned development.
  • Second, India competes with China in providing aid outside government budgets. And China picks up projects of visibility and strategic location. Chinese involvement in Nepal has increased since the April 2015 earthquake and Nepal is surely an area of strategic influence in China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

People-to-people ties

In the past two decades, two significant changes have happened in this area.

  • First, Indian workers in Nepal constitute a big part of the workforceand send about $3 billion to India every year. In terms of remittances to India, Nepal ranks eighth. So, the Government of India needs to keep in mind that many households in India are being run with remittances from Nepal.
  • Second, the new Nepal is comprising of young people with global aspirations. Nearly three-fourths of the population of Nepal is under 35 years of age. India needs to engage beyond its current constituency and Nepal needs to plan how it engages with the youth in mainland India.

 

Conclusion:

  • There are some fundamentals that we simply cannot forget: geography will not change, the border will remain open as millions of livelihoods on both sides depend on it, and China is going to be a big global player with varied interests in the neighbourhood.
  • Therefore, the India-Nepal relationship has to be recalibrated.

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-nepals-grant-from-the-us-and-what-it-means-for-its-equations-with-china-7843313/